Dr. Mary Aiken stands on the forefront of cyberpsychology, exploring the intricate relationship between know-how and human behaviour.
As a professor and chair of the Division of Cyberpsychology at Capitol Expertise College in Washington D.C., and a Professor of Forensic Cyberpsychology on the College of East London, she has devoted her profession to understanding the psychological implications of our digital lives.
A extremely sought-after cybersecurity speaker, Dr Aiken shares her experience on international levels, providing distinctive insights into cyber behaviour and digital threat. We spoke along with her to delve into the evolving panorama of cyberpsychology, the challenges posed by rising applied sciences, and the way people and organisations can navigate the complexities of the digital age.
In your view, how essential is it that cybersecurity evolves to completely incorporate the human layer, and what are essentially the most urgent psychological components that should now be addressed?
To start with, let’s speak about our on-line world. As cyber psychologists, folks like myself have been discussing our on-line world for one of the best a part of 20 years. In truth, in 2016, NATO formally ratified our on-line world as an setting — as a site — recognising that the battles of the longer term would happen not solely on land, sea, and air, but additionally throughout laptop networks.
The US navy conceptualises our on-line world as comprising three layers. Firstly, there may be the bodily community, which incorporates the {hardware}, cables, and infrastructure. Secondly, there may be the logical community, which facilitates communication throughout these networks. And at last, there may be the cyber persona layer—that’s us, the people.
After we speak about incorporating the human layer into the cybersecurity equation, now we have to acknowledge that we’ve had 50 to 60 years of cybersecurity, and it has been very efficient in addressing the primary two layers: the bodily and logical networks. Nonetheless, the overwhelming majority of cyberattacks right now are pushed by social engineering — and social engineering has way more to do with psychology than with know-how.
In consequence, we’re now seeing the emergence of a brand new sector below the broader umbrella of cybersecurity: the web security know-how sector, or SafetyTech. I’m proud to be one of many founding members of this sector within the UK. Our mission is to develop technological options to technology-facilitated issues — particularly dangerous and felony behaviours on-line.
To summarise, we should issue the human into the cybersecurity equation — from the attitude of customers, workers, and cyber attackers. And after we have a look at the spectrum of cyber risk actors — from state-sponsored to state-condoned, from hacktivists to activists, from organised cybercrime to classy risk teams — we’d like options that aren’t solely technically sturdy and resilient, but additionally account for human psychological resilience.
We would like our knowledge methods and networks to be safe, however equally, we’d like the folks working these methods to be psychologically protected, sturdy, and resilient. That’s how we will ship on what I name 360-degree resilience.
As one of many foremost specialists in cyber psychology, how does the science underpinning this subject inform your public talking, notably when partaking with sectors grappling with tech-driven behavioural change?
In cyber psychology, we examine particular results — for instance, the web disinhibition impact — which explains why folks usually behave in methods on-line that they’d by no means think about in the true world. It’s a key behavioural driver in digital environments.
We additionally discover the facility of on-line anonymity, which may be useful in some contexts however may act like a ‘superhuman energy of invisibility’. And, as with all powers, it comes with accountability — one thing not all the time exercised properly by people.
In fact, we additionally observe constructive on-line behaviours, akin to altruism, seen in actions like crowdsourced fundraising. The basic precept is that human behaviour modifications in on-line environments, and understanding the influence of those behavioural shifts is crucial.
Via my talking engagements, I’ve the privilege of addressing a variety of sectors — know-how, cybersecurity, infosec, monetary companies, schooling, e-commerce, and healthcare. All of those industries profit from deeper insights into how know-how influences human behaviour, each from the consumer and operator views.
My analysis spans a lot of areas, together with cyberchondria — a type of well being anxiousness that manifests on-line. Many people have skilled this: a headache rapidly spirals into Googling signs, resulting in panic over critical situations like mind tumours.
One other latest space of focus is cyber fraud. Within the UK, laws such because the On-line Security Act is geared toward addressing this sort of cyber-enabled criminality. I’ve contributed to quite a few data campaigns that target one in every of my key areas of experience: cyber behavioural profiling.
Many campaigns inform folks, “Don’t click on the hyperlink.” I am going a step additional — I analyse the semantics of phishing messages, breaking down how attackers manipulate language and psychology to compel customers to behave. Understanding the emotional and cognitive triggers that cybercriminals exploit helps us higher educate the general public and defend towards such assaults.
By way of discuss subjects, I cowl a broad spectrum — from human components in cybersecurity to cyber behavioural profiling, and more and more, the psychology of AI.
With the speedy rise of generative AI and different superior applied sciences, how should stakeholders throughout business and authorities recalibrate their pondering to successfully handle each threat and alternative?
In the case of applied sciences like AI, we’ve seen many false dawns — in addition to quite a lot of ethical panics. Take the emergence of ChatGPT, for example. Individuals turned excited by the novelty of chatbots, however in fact, chatbots have been round for many years.
The primary chatbot, Eliza, was developed within the Sixties. She was modelled on Rogerian psychology and was extremely efficient at eliciting data. When she requested questions like “How are you?” and adopted up with “Inform me extra about your day,” folks started sharing deeply private tales. The response was so sturdy that the programme was shut down pretty rapidly — its inventor was reportedly horrified by how a lot folks disclosed.
Within the Nineties, I had the pleasure of working with one other chatbot, Jabberwacky, which was developed by a colleague of mine. It was a superb and revolutionary piece of know-how. What we’re witnessing now could be the continuing evolution of this area.
As for the widespread concern that AI will replicate human intelligence and render us out of date, I stay sceptical. As a behavioural scientist, I’d level out that we don’t but totally perceive how the human mind works. The concept we will replicate or substitute one thing we don’t totally comprehend is, to me, a flawed premise.
As a substitute of specializing in ‘synthetic intelligence’, I advocate for a distinct method: IIA (Intelligence Augmentation). This idea, impressed by Licklider’s Nineteen Fifties work Man-Pc Symbiosis, proposes a mannequin during which human and machine intelligence work symbiotically.
With IIA, we maintain the human on the centre of the method. That, I consider, is how we must always body our engagement with AI and machine studying – specializing in augmentation, not alternative.
Trying forward, there are undoubtedly thrilling and important modifications on the horizon. I’m notably within the convergence of quantum computing, machine studying, and AI. That mixture stands out as the level at which we really start to imitate points of human intelligence.
In delivering insights throughout international establishments, from NATO to the UN, what core message or shift in mindset do you most hope audiences will stroll away with after listening to you communicate?
As one of many world’s main specialists in cyber psychology, I’ve had the honour of being invited to talk at high-level boards world wide — from the White Home to NATO, from the United Nations to INTERPOL.
By way of conferences, I’ve spoken at gatherings throughout the spectrum — cybersecurity, infosec, healthtech, fintech, regtech, edtech, in addition to coverage and policing boards. This breadth and depth replicate the common relevance of cyber psychology in right now’s digital world.
My function is to equip audiences with the data, instruments, and skillsets wanted to confront the advanced challenges that emerge on the intersection of people and know-how.
I assist folks assume otherwise — empowering them to design and deploy technology-based options to technology-facilitated issues, together with dangerous and felony on-line behaviours.
Finally, my aim is to make folks extra knowledgeable, extra assured, and higher ready to interact with know-how in a method that’s protected, moral, and efficient.
And most significantly, I purpose to encourage collaboration, as a result of we’re all working on this shared setting of our on-line world. If we’re to make it safer and safer, it’ll take collective accountability and international cooperation.
Picture by Mostafa Saeed on Unsplash
This interview with Dr Mary Aiken was performed by Mark Matthews.
Wish to study extra about cybersecurity and the cloud from business leaders? Try Cyber Safety & Cloud Expo happening in Amsterdam, California, and London.
Discover different upcoming enterprise know-how occasions and webinars powered by TechForge right here.
